Reaction paper (Greg Stahly) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Reaction paper (Greg Stahly) - Essay exemplificationHe identified himself as a ceramic artist, a term that I had never perceive of, and up to now though many of his products are displayed in museums, I still hold the opinion that his work are not delicious. Gregs products however exhibit some elements of art. I consider his soda vapour glazing, a work that involved pottery, as his artistically richest work. Even though the product involved handwork creativity skills, its artistic elements are realized in its function process rather than implementation of the design to develop the product. Greg also associates himself more with creation of products for use. He for example creates bowls from which people can eat, water ports for watering flowers and develop color schemes to capture peoples attention. His soda vapor without glazing was particularly owing(p) and neat. It only applied a particular type of fire wood with diversified natural colors that were derived from flames, par ts of the wood and ash. Even though a distant glance of the work would not captivate, a closer cash advance to intellect the coloration identifies the quality in the product. Mixing of colors is the basis of this particular piece of work. an opposite(prenominal) diagnosable feature of Gregs work is that his products offer tangible utility. They are not merely commodities to be seen but are things that are applicable in daily life processes. His works whence puts me in a dilemma as I fail to understand the precise difference between a person who makes products and a person who invent products towards development and sale. The concept of ceramic art also confuses me because even though I can comprehend aspect of art as implied in the works, I do not understand how the works can be generally considered art. This is because Greg develops his products without outlined motive. Examples involve his development of expansive shapes and suspending them in a museum without a clear intent. Even though he later developed an understanding from his Cadaver bags that he tried to lift but fell down to six feet, such a theme of communicating aspects of death was not in his intentions at the time of developing the bags. I therefore hold the opinion that Greg is just an explorer who delights himself in making funny items and observing how his made items operate. This, in my opinion, is a development of products for physical utility and not art. 50 ways in is another of Gregs works that appears to be controversial to me with respect to artistic consideration. The work only exhibits a few elements of artistic development and induces the dilemma of whether to consider it artistic or not. It was developed from ceramic, latex tubing, case rubber, aluminum, and 120 tubes and is identifiable with 50 center fieldballs with tails that converge to a focal point on a wall. The works theme was to illustrate 50 of ways locating a particular point and even though the works title was capt ivating, the theory behind it, and the way in which Greg explained it is not. Greg for instance explained that every eye was the size of a grape fruit or one of the larger groups of fruits, a statement that identifies ambiguity. His other presumed art regarded construction of pipelines and forward pass view of the city. He exhibit diagrams of both pipelines and electrical line from an aerial view. The aim of such a development was to illustrate underground installations and even though he demonstrated an understanding of involved appliances, this work closely identifies with construction than it does with art.